🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the UK, and it feels like it’s time for a reassessment. Throughout its history, an event that began as a festivity and recollection of heritage, traditions and links between global Black communities, has taken on a commercial tone, expanding to include functions where individuals of African heritage are paid to speak with Caucasian groups about implicit prejudice and supportive partnership. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade generated a rise in the industry of demonstrating racial awareness. However, that period has concluded. The surge has reached its height, producing a diluted aftermath of what raising awareness is for.

The Origins of Black History Celebration

Originally observed in the US and Canada, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with a week of commemoration and observance in the second week of February. Black History Month developed from this movement and was officially launched in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the United States and Canada in winter, but also in autumn in the Britain, Germany, the Republic of Ireland and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The month has evolved since that time, focusing less on the narratives of colonial slavery and civil rights battles, and increasingly on influential individuals of color in politics, culture, and activism, and extensively acknowledging the impact Black people have made to mold society. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with lectures and artistic activities. But the method the celebration is observed is a indication of the political moment. How it develops is a valuable example in how assimilation leads to dismantling: the transformation of Black History Month has hindered the purpose of it, which is to address structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Troubling Time

Hardly anything shows how important it is to reconsider Black History Month more than the specific period in which it occurs this year. In the UK, a reemerging right-wing in the shape of the Reform party is ahead in surveys. In the warmer months we witnessed the biggest extreme right demonstration in British history. a prominent political figure, the Black leader of the Conservative party, is a strong critic of anti-racism activism, and we are in a position where a legislator feels emboldened to state that a lack of white people in certain urban areas is a reason for concern. Simultaneously, ultra-nationalist movements are growing in the European continent as a complete entity.

In the United States, a significant offensive against DEI and affirmative action has been carried, often successfully, to the highest courts of the state. A drive to scrub African American heritage and experience from the records is ongoing. One of the former president's initial presidential directives targeted the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the prestigious establishment, accusing them of a organized and extensive campaign to rewrite our Nation’s history” by portraying America “as inherently racist”.

Against this backdrop, the month illustrates how minimally it can be effective if it is confined to either obligatory business commemorations, or stripped of political content celebrations of former accomplishments, rather than addressing the situation of the current era. It also demonstrates how its restricted time span means that it is detached from the broader ongoing work that is required. A university professor, a prof at University of Greenwich, articulated it most accurately when she expressed apprehension about the short-term symbolic gestures of the celebration. “The problem with adopting a symbolic stance”, she wrote, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month turns into a fleeting performance rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Determining how to alter, change and broaden initiatives for racial equality and recognition in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a treacherous thing. There is a urge to just eliminate observances such as Black History Month altogether, thinking they are inadequate for current needs, or are remnants of an time that has failed to deliver.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and tradition of campaigns for equality – local anti-racism groups, inclusion and equity efforts, and indeed, including corporate presentations – form an framework that a lot of work has been dedicated to. It is there not just to decay as the situation evolves (and in fact, regresses), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a fresh vibrant Black History Month look like? Firstly, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is dispersed through the year (as certain organizations are already commencing), elements of its material (particularly around historic Black characters) integrated into educational programs. It would also be a period that does not avoid politics, and allows opportunity for individuals, particularly youth, to air their fears and experiences. What purpose serves basic knowledge of the past when it fails to address the contemporary truth of extreme conservative demonstrations in the urban areas? Establishments who observe it should not be reassured with the passive language of “unconscious bias” and alertness to minor insults, but confronted with the risks that impact society if fight against prejudice is not approached earnestly. To summarize, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, critical, and responsive. Perhaps an entire name rebrand is required – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.